Title: Normalization Process Theory: a Framework for Developing, Evaluating and Implementing Complex Interventions
نویسندگان
چکیده
We have expanded the sentence in the abstract background as suggested by the reviewer, so that it now reads: “Such interventions can only have a significant impact on health and health care if they are shown to be effective when tested, are capable of being widely implemented and can be normalised into routine practice”. Abstract Summary has also been amended in line with the reviewer’s comments, so that the first sentence now reads: “The NPT is a new theory which offers trialists a consistent framework that can be used to describe, assess and enhance implementation potential.”Summary has also been amended in line with the reviewer’s comments, so that the first sentence now reads: “The NPT is a new theory which offers trialists a consistent framework that can be used to describe, assess and enhance implementation potential.” We agree with the referee that all trials are themselves complex interventions and have expanded both the abstract and the text of the main paper to reflect this: “The need to ensure trial procedures are feasible and compatible with clinical practice is not limited to trials of complex interventions and NPT may improve trial design by highlighting potential problems with recruitment or data collection, as well as ensuring the intervention has good implementation potential”. Background. Old Paragraph 2: We have expanded our argument in paragraph 2, page 4, both in relation to patient recruitment and the wider issues of the gap between research evidence and practice. In both cases, we have strengthened the link between the gaps identified and the potential solutions offered by NPT. Old Paragraph 3: It is our contention that both researchers designing complex interventions and funders funding their evaluation should consider using NPT to assess an intervention’s potential for implementation success. We have therefore expanded this paragraph, on pages 4-5, to make this clearer. Discussion. Use of NPT to define context: We have expanded Section 2.1.1, page 6, detailing how use of NPT helped us to understand the context in which a complex intervention was set and adapt the intervention to increase its use in primary care. We have also expanded Section 2.1.3, page 6, to show how lessons derived from using NPT in the Impact Back study were then applied to the design of a subsequent complex intervention. NPT in relation to clinical trials: We have now expanded our discussion of NPT as a trial killer to consider clinical trials as well (page 7). Implementation: We accept that there is a wide literature on the issues of implementation. We have expanded out discussion of that in Section 1.1, with particular reference to the needs of policy makers, and refer to that in this Section on page 8. Summary. How does this approach build on that of others? We have expanded our argument explaining why we believe that NPT develops the issues discussed in this paper – see pages 8-9. Discussion We have expanded the last sentences to address the comments of the reviewer. Reviewer 2. Section 2.1: In Section 2.1.1, page 6, we have expanded our discussion of the way in which understanding the context is important and how context may impact on the four components of NPT, namely coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring. We have also expanded Section 2.2.1, page 7, to further address this criticism. Later, in Section 2.3.1 page 6, we have expanded on the way in which the information was translated into action, in relation to both the re-design of the Impact Back study and the development of a later trial. Strengths and limitations of applying NPT: We expanded our discussion of the issue surrounding implementation in Section 1.1, with particular reference to the needs of policy makers. We have also expanded the Summary and relating our work on using NPT with the recent Cochrane review on tailored interventions, as helpfully suggested by the reviewer. Abstract. This has now been expanded. This has now been expanded.
منابع مشابه
Evaluating Health in All Policies; Comment on “Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia”
Health in All Policies (HiAP) has gained attention as a potential tool to address complex health and societal challenges at global, regional, national and subnational levels. In a recent article, Lawless et al propose an evaluation framework developed in the context of the South Australia HiAP initiative. Strategies, mediators, activities and impacts identified in the framework could potentiall...
متن کاملDeveloping a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia
Background The importance of evaluating policy processes to achieve health equity is well recognised but such evaluation encounters methodological, theoretical and political challenges. This paper describes how a program theorybased evaluation framework can be developed and tested, using the example of an evaluation of the South Australian Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiative. Methods A f...
متن کاملImproving the normalization of complex interventions: measure development based on normalization process theory (NoMAD): study protocol
BACKGROUND Understanding implementation processes is key to ensuring that complex interventions in healthcare are taken up in practice and thus maximize intended benefits for service provision and (ultimately) care to patients. Normalization Process Theory (NPT) provides a framework for understanding how a new intervention becomes part of normal practice. This study aims to develop and validate...
متن کاملHow Do We Evaluate Health in All Policies?; Comment on “Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia”
It is well-established that population health is influenced by a multitude of factors, many of which lie outside the scope of the health sector. In the public health literature it is often assumed that intersectoral engagement with nonhealth sectors will be instrumental in addressing these social determinants of health. Due to the expected desirable outcomes in population health, several countr...
متن کاملPolicy, Theory, and Evaluation: Stop Mixing the Fruit Salad; Comment on “Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia”
The study of Health in All Policies (HiAP) is gaining momentum. Authors are increasingly turning to wide swathes of political and social theory to frame (Program) Theory Based (or Informed) Evaluation (TBE) approaches. TBE for HiAP is not only prudent, it adds a level of elegance and insight to the research toolbox. However, it is still necessary to organize theoretical thinking appropriately. ...
متن کاملIdeas for Extending the Approach to Evaluating Health in All Policies in South Australia; Comment on “Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia”
Since 2008, the government of South Australia has been using a Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach to achieve their strategic plan (South Australia Strategic Plan of 2004). In this commentary, we summarize some of the strengths and contributions of the innovative evaluation framework that was developed by an embedded team of academic researchers. To inform how the use of HiAP is evaluated mo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010